Search Constraints

Start Over
You searched for: Institution Michigan State University. Libraries Remove constraint Institution: Michigan State University. Libraries Place United States Remove constraint Place: United States Topic Election law Remove constraint Topic: Election law
1 - 4 of 4
Number of results to display per page
View results as:
List Map Gallery

Search Results

1. Oral argument of the vote recount case Bush v. Gore before the U.S. Supreme Court

Description:
Theodore B. Olson, attorney for presidential candidate George W. Bush, opens oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in the vote recount case Bush v. Gore. Olson suggests that the Florida Supreme Court was arbitrary in its decision about which votes should be recounted. Gore's attorney David Boies argues that Florida law is clear that where voter intent can be discerned the vote should be counted.
Date Issued:
2000-12-11T00:00:00Z
Data Provider:
Michigan State University. Libraries
Collection:
G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection

2. The Voting Rights Act, introduced by President Johnson in 1965, comes up for renewal

Description:
Barbara Jordan urges that the extension of the Voting Rights Act should include Mexican-Americans and other minorities.
Date Issued:
1975-04-25T00:00:00Z
Data Provider:
Michigan State University. Libraries
Collection:
G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection

3. The Voting Rights Act, introduced by President Johnson in 1965, comes up for renewal

Description:
Barbara Jordan urges that the extension of the Voting Rights Act should include Mexican-Americans and other minorities.
Date Issued:
1975-04-25T00:00:00Z
Data Provider:
Michigan State University. Libraries
Collection:
G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection

4. Oral argument of the vote recount case Bush v. Gore before the U.S. Supreme Court

Description:
Theodore B. Olson, attorney for presidential candidate George W. Bush, opens oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in the vote recount case Bush v. Gore. Olson suggests that the Florida Supreme Court was arbitrary in its decision about which votes should be recounted. Gore's attorney David Boies argues that Florida law is clear that where voter intent can be discerned the vote should be counted.
Date Issued:
2000-12-11T00:00:00Z
Data Provider:
Michigan State University. Libraries
Collection:
G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection