Search Constraints
« Previous |
1 - 10 of 16
|
Next »
Search Results
- Description:
- During the morning session on the fifteenth day of the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, Chief Justice William Rehnquist questions Clinton's defense attorneys and members of the House Judiciary Committee who are serving as "managers", the equivalent of prosecutors. The questions, which are provided by Senators and simply read by Rehnquist, focus on the nature of the arguments made by the Managers and Clinton's attorneys. Clinton's attorneys Charles Ruff, Cheryl D. Mills, David Kendall and Greg Craig defend their original arguments against conviction under Republican questioning. Managers Ed Bryant (R-TN), Asa Hutchinson II (R-AR), Charles T. Canady (R-FL), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Bob Barr Jr. (R-GA) and James E. Rogan (R-CA) defend their arguments for conviction under Democratic questioning. Part one of four.
- Date Issued:
- 1999-01-22T00:00:00Z
- Data Provider:
- Michigan State University. Libraries
- Collection:
- G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection
- Description:
- During the morning session on the nineteenth day of the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, members of the House Judiciary Committee serving as "managers", the equivalent of prosecutors, present their case for the introduction of witnesses into the trial. Managers Ed Bryant (R-TN), Asa Hutchinson (R-AR) and James E. Rogan (R-CA) explain their reasoning for introducing witnesses. Clinton attorney David Kendall responds to the managers, explaining why introducing witnesses to the trial is unnecessary. Managers Bill McCollum (R-FL) and Henry Hyde (R-IL) join Bryant, Hutchinson and Rogan for the rebuttal of Kendall. Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) submits a proposal that the Senate debate and vote on the option to introduce witnesses in a closed session.
- Date Issued:
- 1999-01-26T00:00:00Z
- Data Provider:
- Michigan State University. Libraries
- Collection:
- G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection
- Description:
- Special Counsel to the President David Kendall delivers his argument against conviction as the Senate continues the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton. Kendall provides a detailed chronology of events regarding Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky and the aftermath and explains that these events are not proof of illegal acts by the President. Kendall asserts that the facts, the law, and the Constitution are all on the side of the President.
- Date Issued:
- 1999-01-21T00:00:00Z
- Data Provider:
- Michigan State University. Libraries
- Collection:
- G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection
- Description:
- During the first afternoon session on the fifteenth day of the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, Chief Justice William Rehnquist questions Clinton's defense attorneys and members of the House Judiciary Committee who are serving as "managers", the equivalent of prosecutors. The questions, which are provided by Senators and simply read by Rehnquist, focus on the nature of the arguments made by the Managers and Clinton's attorneys. Clinton's attorneys Charles Ruff and David Kendall defend their original arguments against conviction under Republican questioning. Managers James E. Rogan (R-CA), Charles T. Canady (R-FL), Bill McCollum (R-FL), Asa Hutchinson II (R-AR), Steve Buyer (R-IN) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) defend their arguments for conviction under Democratic questioning. Part two of four.
- Date Issued:
- 1999-01-22T00:00:00Z
- Data Provider:
- Michigan State University. Libraries
- Collection:
- G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection
- Description:
- During the second afternoon session on the fifteenth day of the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, Chief Justice William Rehnquist questions Clinton's defense attorneys and members of the House Judiciary Committee who are serving as "managers", the equivalent of prosecutors. The questions, which are provided by Senators and simply read by Rehnquist, focus on the nature of the arguments made by the Managers and Clinton's attorneys. Clinton's attorneys David Kendall, Charles Ruff, Greg Craig and Cheryl D. Mills defend their original arguments against conviction under Republican questioning. Managers Ed Bryant (R-TN), Henry Hyde (R-IL), James E. Rogan (R-CA), Charles T. Canady (R-FL), Steve Buyer (R-IN), Asa Hutchinson II (R-AR) and Bill McCollum (R-FL) defend their arguments for conviction under Democratic questioning. Part three of four.
- Date Issued:
- 1999-01-22T00:00:00Z
- Data Provider:
- Michigan State University. Libraries
- Collection:
- G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection
- Description:
- Dale Bumpers (D-AK), former Arkansas Governor and recently resigned Senator, speaks before the Senate presenting his case against the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. Bumpers evokes the weight of history and the Constitution, whose framers he says feared legislative control over the executive branch. Bumpers also asserts that this 5-year "vendetta" has cost taxpayers $50 million to spite a President who never committed a political crime against the United States. Bumpers emphasizes that those who vote to impeach will have a lifetime to regret it.
- Date Issued:
- 1999-01-21T00:00:00Z
- Data Provider:
- Michigan State University. Libraries
- Collection:
- G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection
- Description:
- During the afternoon session on the sixteenth day of the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, Chief Justice William Rehnquist questions Clinton's defense attorneys and members of the House Judiciary Committee who are serving as "managers", the equivalent of prosecutors. The questions, which are provided by Senators and simply read by Rehnquist, focus on the nature of the arguments made by the Managers and Clinton's attorneys. Clinton's attorneys Charles Ruff, David Kendall and Greg Craig defend their original arguments against conviction under Republican questioning. House Managers Henry Hyde (R-IL), Ed Bryant (R-TN), Bill McCollum (R-FL), Steve Buyer (R-IN), Asa Hutchinson II (R-AR), Bob Barr Jr. (R-GA) and Charles T. Canady (R-FL) defend their arguments for conviction under Democratic questioning. Part four of four.
- Date Issued:
- 1999-01-23T00:00:00Z
- Data Provider:
- Michigan State University. Libraries
- Collection:
- G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection
- Description:
- House of Representatives managers Charles Canady (R-FL) and Asa Hutchinson (R-AK) discuss why the Senate should not move forward with Senator Robert Byrd's (D-WV) motion to dismiss the Bill Clinton impeachment trial entirely. Attorney to the President Nicole Seligman defends the motion to dismiss. Fellow House managers Lindsey Graham (R-SC), George Gekas (R-PA), and Henry Hyde (R-IL) provide their rebuttal to Seligman's statements. Both sides agree that the public deserves a resolution to this issue sooner rather than later. Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) asks for and is granted a closed-door vote on the motion to dismiss.
- Date Issued:
- 1999-01-25T00:00:00Z
- Data Provider:
- Michigan State University. Libraries
- Collection:
- G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection
- Description:
- During the first afternoon session on the fifteenth day of the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, Chief Justice William Rehnquist questions Clinton's defense attorneys and members of the House Judiciary Committee who are serving as "managers", the equivalent of prosecutors. The questions, which are provided by Senators and simply read by Rehnquist, focus on the nature of the arguments made by the Managers and Clinton's attorneys. Clinton's attorneys Charles Ruff and David Kendall defend their original arguments against conviction under Republican questioning. Managers James E. Rogan (R-CA), Charles T. Canady (R-FL), Bill McCollum (R-FL), Asa Hutchinson II (R-AR), Steve Buyer (R-IN) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) defend their arguments for conviction under Democratic questioning. Part two of four.
- Date Issued:
- 1999-01-22T00:00:00Z
- Data Provider:
- Michigan State University. Libraries
- Collection:
- G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection
- Description:
- Dale Bumpers (D-AK), former Arkansas Governor and recently resigned Senator, speaks before the Senate presenting his case against the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. Bumpers evokes the weight of history and the Constitution, whose framers he says feared legislative control over the executive branch. Bumpers also asserts that this 5-year "vendetta" has cost taxpayers $50 million to spite a President who never committed a political crime against the United States. Bumpers emphasizes that those who vote to impeach will have a lifetime to regret it.
- Date Issued:
- 1999-01-21T00:00:00Z
- Data Provider:
- Michigan State University. Libraries
- Collection:
- G. Robert Vincent Voice Library Collection